During the Translation Process Mrna Is Read How Many Nucleotides Art the Time

Proteins are synthesized from mRNA templates by a process that has been highly conserved throughout evolution (reviewed in Affiliate 3). All mRNAs are read in the 5´ to 3´ direction, and polypeptide chains are synthesized from the amino to the carboxy terminus. Each amino acid is specified by three bases (a codon) in the mRNA, according to a nearly universal genetic lawmaking. The basic mechanics of protein synthesis are besides the same in all cells: Translation is carried out on ribosomes, with tRNAs serving as adaptors between the mRNA template and the amino acids being incorporated into protein. Protein synthesis thus involves interactions between three types of RNA molecules (mRNA templates, tRNAs, and rRNAs), also equally various proteins that are required for translation.

Transfer RNAs

During translation, each of the 20 amino acids must exist aligned with their corresponding codons on the mRNA template. All cells incorporate a variety of tRNAs that serve as adaptors for this procedure. Equally might be expected, given their mutual function in poly peptide synthesis, different tRNAs share similar overall structures. However, they also possess unique identifying sequences that allow the correct amino acrid to be attached and aligned with the appropriate codon in mRNA.

Transfer RNAs are approximately lxx to fourscore nucleotides long and have characteristic cloverleaf structures that effect from complementary base of operations pairing between different regions of the molecule (Figure 7.1). X-ray crystallography studies take further shown that all tRNAs fold into similar compact L shapes, which are probable required for the tRNAs to fit onto ribosomes during the translation process. The adaptor function of the tRNAs involves two separated regions of the molecule. All tRNAs accept the sequence CCA at their 3´ terminus, and amino acids are covalently fastened to the ribose of the concluding adenosine. The mRNA template is then recognized by the anticodon loop, located at the other end of the folded tRNA, which binds to the appropriate codon by complementary base pairing.

Figure 7.1

Construction of tRNAs. The structure of yeast phenylalanyl tRNA is illustrated in open "cloverleaf" grade (A) to show complementary base pairing. Modified bases are indicated as mG, methylguanosine; mC, methylcytosine; DHU, dihydrouridine; (more...)

The incorporation of the correctly encoded amino acids into proteins depends on the attachment of each amino acid to an appropriate tRNA, as well as on the specificity of codon-anticodon base pairing. The attachment of amino acids to specific tRNAs is mediated past a grouping of enzymes called aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, which were discovered by Paul Zamecnik and Mahlon Hoagland in 1957. Each of these enzymes recognizes a unmarried amino acrid, besides as the correct tRNA (or tRNAs) to which that amino acid should be attached. The reaction proceeds in two steps (Figure 7.2). Showtime, the amino acid is activated by reaction with ATP to form an aminoacyl AMP synthetase intermediate. The activated amino acid is then joined to the 3´ terminus of the tRNA. The aminoacyl tRNA synthetases must be highly selective enzymes that recognize both individual amino acids and specific base of operations sequences that identify the right acceptor tRNAs. In some cases, the high fidelity of amino acid recognition results in part from a proofreading function by which incorrect aminoacyl AMPs are hydrolyzed rather than being joined to tRNA during the 2d step of the reaction. Recognition of the right tRNA past the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase is also highly selective; the synthetase recognizes specific nucleotide sequences (in nearly cases including the anticodon) that uniquely identify each species of tRNA.

Figure vii.2

Zipper of amino acids to tRNAs. In the first reaction pace, the amino acid is joined to AMP, forming an aminoacyl AMP intermediate. In the second step, the amino acid is transferred to the 3´ CCA terminus of the acceptor tRNA and AMP is released. (more...)

After being attached to tRNA, an amino acid is aligned on the mRNA template by complementary base pairing between the mRNA codon and the anticodon of the tRNA. Codon-anticodon base pairing is somewhat less stringent than the standard A-U and G-C base pairing discussed in preceding chapters. The significance of this unusual base of operations pairing in codon-anticodon recognition relates to the redundancy of the genetic code. Of the 64 possible codons, 3 are stop codons that point the termination of translation; the other 61 encode amino acids (run into Table three.1). Thus, nearly of the amino acids are specified by more one codon. In part, this back-up results from the attachment of many amino acids to more than than ane species of tRNA. E. coli, for example, comprise about forty different tRNAs that serve as acceptors for the 20 different amino acids. In addition, some tRNAs are able to recognize more than than one codon in mRNA, as a result of nonstandard base pairing (called wobble) betwixt the tRNA anticodon and the third position of some complementary codons (Effigy vii.3). Relaxed base pairing at this position results partly from the formation of G-U base pairs and partly from the modification of guanosine to inosine in the anticodons of several tRNAs during processing (see Effigy 6.38). Inosine can base-pair with either C, U, or A in the third position, so its inclusion in the anticodon allows a single tRNA to recognize three unlike codons in mRNA templates.

Figure vii.3

Nonstandard codon-anticodon base of operations pairing. Base of operations pairing at the third codon position is relaxed, assuasive Yard to pair with U, and inosine (I) in the anticodon to pair with U, C, or A. Ii examples of abnormal base pairing, allowing phenylalanyl (Phe) tRNA (more than...)

The Ribosome

Ribosomes are the sites of protein synthesis in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. First characterized equally particles detected by ultracentrifugation of jail cell lysates, ribosomes are usually designated according to their rates of sedimentation: 70S for bacterial ribosomes and 80S for the somewhat larger ribosomes of eukaryotic cells. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes are composed of 2 singled-out subunits, each containing characteristic proteins and rRNAs. The fact that cells typically comprise many ribosomes reflects the key importance of protein synthesis in jail cell metabolism. East. coli, for example, contain about 20,000 ribosomes, which business relationship for approximately 25% of the dry out weight of the cell, and quickly growing mammalian cells contain most 10 million ribosomes.

The general structures of prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes are similar, although they differ in some details (Figure seven.iv). The small subunit (designated 30S) of E. coli ribosomes consists of the 16S rRNA and 21 proteins; the big subunit (50S) is equanimous of the 23S and 5S rRNAs and 34 proteins. Each ribosome contains i copy of the rRNAs and one copy of each of the ribosomal proteins, with one exception: One poly peptide of the 50S subunit is nowadays in iv copies. The subunits of eukaryotic ribosomes are larger and contain more proteins than their prokaryotic counterparts have. The minor subunit (40S) of eukaryotic ribosomes is composed of the 18S rRNA and approximately 30 proteins; the large subunit (60S) contains the 28S, 5.8S, and 5S rRNAs and nearly 45 proteins.

Figure 7.4

Ribosome construction. (A) Electron micrograph of E. coli 50S ribosomal subunits. (B–C) Loftier resolution X-ray crystal structures of 30S (B) and 50S (C) ribosomal subunits. (D) Model of ribosome structure. (E) Components of prokaryotic and eukaryotic (more...)

A noteworthy feature of ribosomes is that they can be formed in vitro past self-assembly of their RNA and protein constituents. Equally beginning described in 1968 by Masayasu Nomura, purified ribosomal proteins and rRNAs can be mixed together and, under appropriate conditions, will reform a functional ribosome. Although ribosome assembly in vivo (particularly in eukaryotic cells) is considerably more than complicated, the power of ribosomes to self-gather in vitro has provided an important experimental tool, allowing analysis of the roles of individual proteins and rRNAs.

Like tRNAs, rRNAs course characteristic secondary structures by complementary base pairing (Figure 7.5). In association with ribosomal proteins the rRNAs fold further, into distinct three-dimensional structures. Initially, rRNAs were thought to play a structural office, providing a scaffold upon which ribosomal proteins get together. However, with the discovery of the catalytic activeness of other RNA molecules (e.1000., RNase P and the self-splicing introns discussed in Affiliate 6), the possible catalytic role of rRNA became widely considered. Consistent with this hypothesis, rRNAs were establish to exist absolutely required for the in vitro associates of functional ribosomes. On the other hand, the omission of many ribosomal proteins resulted in a decrease, but not a complete loss, of ribosome activity.

Figure vii.5

The structure of 16S rRNA. Complementary base of operations pairing results in the formation of a distinct secondary structure. (From South. Stern, T. Powers, L.-I. Changchien and H. F. Noller, 1989. Science 244: 783.)

Straight evidence for the catalytic activity of rRNA beginning came from experiments of Harry Noller and his colleagues in 1992. These investigators demonstrated that the large ribosomal subunit is able to catalyze the formation of peptide bonds (the peptidyl transferase reaction) even afterward approximately 95% of the ribosomal proteins accept been removed by standard protein extraction procedures. In contrast, treatment with RNase completely abolishes peptide bond formation, providing strong support for the hypothesis that the formation of a peptide bond is an RNA-catalyzed reaction. Farther studies take confirmed and extended these results by demonstrating that the peptidyl transferase reaction can be catalyzed past constructed fragments of 23S rRNA in the full absence of any ribosomal protein. Thus, the fundamental reaction of protein synthesis is catalyzed by ribosomal RNA. Rather than existence the primary catalytic constituents of ribosomes, ribosomal proteins are now thought to facilitate proper folding of the rRNA and to enhance ribosome office by properly positioning the tRNAs.

The direct involvement of rRNA in the peptidyl transferase reaction has important evolutionary implications. RNAs are thought to have been the get-go self-replicating macromolecules (see Affiliate i). This notion is strongly supported by the fact that ribozymes, such as RNase P and self-splicing introns, tin catalyze reactions that involve RNA substrates. The function of rRNA in the formation of peptide bonds extends the catalytic activities of RNA beyond self-replication to direct interest in protein synthesis. Boosted studies signal that the Tetrahymena rRNA ribozyme tin catalyze the zipper of amino acids to RNA, lending acceptance to the possibility that the original aminoacyl tRNA synthetases were RNAs rather than proteins. The ability of RNA molecules to catalyze the reactions required for protein synthesis as well as for cocky-replication may provide an important link for agreement the early evolution of cells.

The Organization of mRNAs and the Initiation of Translation

Although the mechanisms of protein synthesis in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells are similar, at that place are also differences, particularly in the signals that determine the positions at which synthesis of a polypeptide chain is initiated on an mRNA template (Figure 7.half dozen). Translation does not simply begin at the five´ end of the mRNA; it starts at specific initiation sites. The 5´ terminal portions of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic mRNAs are therefore noncoding sequences, referred to every bit v´ untranslated regions. Eukaryotic mRNAs ordinarily encode only a single polypeptide concatenation, only many prokaryotic mRNAs encode multiple polypeptides that are synthesized independently from singled-out initiation sites. For example, the Due east. coli lac operon consists of three genes that are translated from the same mRNA (encounter Figure 6.8). Messenger RNAs that encode multiple polypeptides are called polycistronic, whereas monocistronic mRNAs encode a single polypeptide chain. Finally, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic mRNAs cease in noncoding three´ untranslated regions.

Figure seven.6

Prokaryotic and eukaryotic mRNAs. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic mRNAs contain untranslated regions (UTRs) at their v´ and three´ ends. Eukaryotic mRNAs also contain v´ seven-methylguanosine (m⁷G) caps and 3´ poly-A tails. Prokaryotic (more...)

In both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, translation e'er initiates with the amino acid methionine, usually encoded by AUG. Alternative initiation codons, such as GUG, are used occasionally in bacteria, but when they occur at the beginning of a polypeptide chain, these codons straight the incorporation of methionine rather than of the amino acid they unremarkably encode (GUG unremarkably encodes valine). In most bacteria, protein synthesis is initiated with a modified methionine residue (N-formylmethionine), whereas unmodified methionines initiate protein synthesis in eukaryotes (except in mitochondria and chloroplasts, whose ribosomes resemble those of bacteria).

The signals that identify initiation codons are different in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, consequent with the singled-out functions of polycistronic and monocistronic mRNAs (Figure 7.7). Initiation codons in bacterial mRNAs are preceded by a specific sequence (called a Polish-Delgarno sequence, afterwards its discoverers) that aligns the mRNA on the ribosome for translation past base-pairing with a complementary sequence well-nigh the 3´ terminus of 16S rRNA. This base of operations-pairing interaction enables bacterial ribosomes to initiate translation not simply at the v´ end of an mRNA but besides at the internal initiation sites of polycistronic messages. In dissimilarity, ribosomes recognize well-nigh eukaryotic mRNAs by bounden to the 7-methylguanosine cap at their 5´ terminus (come across Figure 6.39). The ribosomes then scan downstream of the 5´ cap until they encounter an AUG initiation codon. Sequences that surround AUGs affect the efficiency of initiation, so in many cases the first AUG in the mRNA is bypassed and translation initiates at an AUG farther downstream. However, eukaryotic mRNAs accept no sequence equivalent to the Shine-Delgarno sequence of prokaryotic mRNAs. Translation of eukaryotic mRNAs is instead initiated at a site determined past scanning from the 5´ terminus, consistent with their functions as monocistronic messages that encode only single polypeptides.

Figure seven.vii

Signals for translation initiation. Initiation sites in prokaryotic mRNAs are characterized by a Smoothen-Delgarno sequence that precedes the AUG initiation codon. Base pairing between the Shine-Delgarno sequence and a complementary sequence near the 3´ (more...)

The Process of Translation

Translation is generally divided into three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination (Figure seven.8). In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes the start step of the initiation stage is the binding of a specific initiator methionyl tRNA and the mRNA to the small ribosomal subunit. The large ribosomal subunit then joins the complex, forming a functional ribosome on which elongation of the polypeptide chain gain. A number of specific nonribosomal proteins are likewise required for the various stages of the translation process (Tabular array seven.one).

The offset translation stride in bacteria is the binding of three initiation factors (IF-i, IF-2, and IF-three) to the 30S ribosomal subunit (Figure 7.nine). The mRNA and initiator Due north-formylmethionyl tRNA then join the circuitous, with IF-2 (which is leap to GTP) specifically recognizing the initiator tRNA. IF-3 is then released, allowing a 50S ribosomal subunit to associate with the complex. This association triggers the hydrolysis of GTP bound to IF-ii, which leads to the release of IF-i and IF-two (spring to GDP). The result is the formation of a 70S initiation complex (with mRNA and initiator tRNA bound to the ribosome) that is set up to brainstorm peptide bail formation during the elongation stage of translation.

Figure 7.nine

Initiation of translation in bacteria. Three initiation factors (IF-1, IF-ii, and IF-iii) first demark to the 30S ribosomal subunit. This step is followed by binding of the mRNA and the initiator Due north-formylmethionyl (fMet) tRNA, which is recognized by IF-2 bound (more...)

Initiation in eukaryotes is more complicated and requires at least ten proteins (each consisting of multiple polypeptide bondage), which are designated eIFs (eukaryotic initiation factors; see Table 7.ane). The factors eIF-one, eIF-1A, and eIF-3 demark to the 40S ribosomal subunit, and eIF-2 (in a complex with GTP) associates with the initiator methionyl tRNA (Figure seven.10). The mRNA is recognized and brought to the ribosome by the eIF-4 grouping of factors. The five´ cap of the mRNA is recognized past eIF-4E. Another factor, eIF-4G, binds to both eIF-4E and to a protein (poly-A bounden poly peptide or PABP) associated with the poly-A tail at the 3' terminate of the mRNA. Eukaryotic initiation factors thus recognize both the five' and iii' ends of mRNAs, accounting for the stimulatory effect of polyadenylation on translation. The initiation factors eIF-4E and eIF-4G, in association with eIF-4A and eIF-4B, then bring the mRNA to the 40S ribosomal subunit, with eIF-4G interacting with eIF-3. The 40S ribosomal subunit, in clan with the bound methionyl tRNA and eIFs, then scans the mRNA to identify the AUG initiation codon. When the AUG codon is reached, eIF-5 triggers the hydrolysis of GTP spring to eIF-two. Initiation factors (including eIF-2 bound to Gdp) are then released, and a 60S subunit binds to the 40S subunit to course the 80S initiation circuitous of eukaryotic cells.

Figure seven.10

Initiation of translation in eukaryotic cells. Initiation factors eIF-3, eIF-1, and eIF-1A demark to the 40S ribosomal subunit. The initiator methionyl tRNA is brought to the ribosome by eIF-2 (complexed to GTP), and the mRNA by eIF-4E (which binds to the (more...)

Subsequently the initiation complex has formed, translation gain by elongation of the polypeptide chain. The mechanism of elongation in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells is very similar (Figure 7.11). The ribosome has three sites for tRNA binding, designated the P (peptidyl), A (aminoacyl), and E (exit) sites. The initiator methionyl tRNA is bound at the P site. The showtime step in elongation is the binding of the adjacent aminoacyl tRNA to the A site by pairing with the 2d codon of the mRNA. The aminoacyl tRNA is escorted to the ribosome by an elongation cistron (EF-Tu in prokaryotes, eEF-1α in eukaryotes), which is complexed to GTP. The GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP as the correct aminoacyl tRNA is inserted into the A site of the ribosome and the elongation cistron bound to Gross domestic product is released. The requirement for hydrolysis of GTP earlier EF-Tu or eEF-1α is released from the ribosome is the rate-limiting step in elongation and provides a time interval during which an wrong aminoacyl tRNA, which would bind less strongly to the mRNA codon, tin dissociate from the ribosome rather than being used for poly peptide synthesis. Thus, the expenditure of a high-energy GTP at this step is an important contribution to authentic protein synthesis; it allows fourth dimension for proofreading of the codon-anticodon pairing before the peptide bond forms.

Effigy 7.11

Elongation phase of translation. The ribosome has 3 tRNA-bounden sites, designated P (peptidyl), A (aminoacyl), and E (exit). The initiating Due north-formylmethionyl tRNA is positioned in the P site, leaving an empty A site. The second aminoacyl tRNA (e.g., (more...)

Once EF-Tu (or eEF-1α) has left the ribosome, a peptide bond can be formed between the initiator methionyl tRNA at the P site and the second aminoacyl tRNA at the A site. This reaction is catalyzed by the large ribosomal subunit, with the rRNA playing a critical role (as already discussed). The result is the transfer of methionine to the aminoacyl tRNA at the A site of the ribosome, forming a peptidyl tRNA at this position and leaving the uncharged initiator tRNA at the P site. The next stride in elongation is translocation, which requires another elongation factor (EF-G in prokaryotes, eEF-2 in eukaryotes) and is again coupled to GTP hydrolysis. During translocation, the ribosome moves three nucleotides along the mRNA, positioning the next codon in an empty A site. This step translocates the peptidyl tRNA from the A site to the P site, and the uncharged tRNA from the P site to the Eastward site. The ribosome is then left with a peptidyl tRNA leap at the P site, and an empty A site. The binding of a new aminoacyl tRNA to the A site then induces the release of the uncharged tRNA from the E site, leaving the ribosome ready for insertion of the next amino acid in the growing polypeptide chain.

As elongation continues, the EF-Tu (or eEF-1α) that is released from the ribosome bound to Gdp must exist reconverted to its GTP form (Figure 7.12). This conversion requires a 3rd elongation factor, EF-Ts (eEF-1βγ in eukaryotes), which binds to the EF-Tu/GDP complex and promotes the exchange of spring Gross domestic product for GTP. This commutation results in the regeneration of EF-Tu/GTP, which is now ready to escort a new aminoacyl tRNA to the A site of the ribosome, start a new cycle of elongation. The regulation of EF-Tu by GTP binding and hydrolysis illustrates a mutual ways of the regulation of poly peptide activities. As will be discussed in later chapters, similar mechanisms control the activities of a broad diverseness of proteins involved in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation, besides every bit in protein transport and secretion.

Figure 7.12

Regeneration of EF-Tu/GTP. EF-Tu complexed to GTP escorts the aminoacyl tRNA to the ribosome. The leap GTP is hydrolyzed as the right tRNA is inserted, and so EF-Tu complexed to Gdp is released. The EF-Tu/Gross domestic product complex is inactive and unable to bind another (more...)

Elongation of the polypeptide chain continues until a terminate codon (UAA, UAG, or UGA) is translocated into the A site of the ribosome. Cells do not comprise tRNAs with anticodons complementary to these termination signals; instead, they have release factors that recognize the signals and terminate poly peptide synthesis (Figure 7.13). Prokaryotic cells incorporate 2 release factors that recognize termination codons: RF-1 recognizes UAA or UAG, and RF-ii recognizes UAA or UGA (come across Table 7.1). In eukaryotic cells a single release factor (eRF-1) recognizes all iii termination codons. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells also contain release factors (RF-3 and eRF-three, respectively) that practice non recognize specific termination codons but act together with RF-1 (or eRF-1) and RF-2. The release factors bind to a termination codon at the A site and stimulate hydrolysis of the bond betwixt the tRNA and the polypeptide chain at the P site, resulting in release of the completed polypeptide from the ribosome. The tRNA is then released, and the ribosomal subunits and the mRNA template dissociate.

Figure 7.13

Termination of translation. A termination codon (e.thousand., UAA) at the A site is recognized by a release cistron rather than by a tRNA. The result is the release of the completed polypeptide chain, followed by the dissociation of tRNA and mRNA from the ribosome. (more...)

Messenger RNAs tin can be translated simultaneously by several ribosomes in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Once i ribosome has moved away from the initiation site, another can bind to the mRNA and begin synthesis of a new polypeptide chain. Thus, mRNAs are commonly translated by a series of ribosomes, spaced at intervals of about 100 to 200 nucleotides (Figure 7.fourteen). The group of ribosomes bound to an mRNA molecule is chosen a polyribosome, or polysome. Each ribosome within the grouping functions independently to synthesize a separate polypeptide chain.

Effigy seven.xiv

Polysomes. Messenger RNAs are translated past a series of multiple ribosomes (a polysome). (A) Electron micrograph of a eukaryotic polysome. (B) Schematic of a generalized poly-some. Note that the ribosomes closer to the 3´ finish of the mRNA accept (more...)

Regulation of Translation

Although transcription is the primary level at which factor expression is controlled, the translation of mRNAs is also regulated in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. One mechanism of translational regulation is the binding of repressor proteins, which block translation, to specific mRNA sequences. The best understood example of this mechanism in eukaryotic cells is regulation of the synthesis of ferritin, a protein that stores iron within the cell. The translation of ferritin mRNA is regulated by the supply of fe: More ferritin is synthesized if fe is arable (Figure vii.fifteen). This regulation is mediated past a protein which (in the absenteeism of iron) binds to a sequence (the iron response element, or IRE) in the v´ untranslated region of ferritin mRNA, blocking its translation. In the presence of fe, the repressor no longer binds to the IRE and ferritin translation is able to keep.

Figure seven.15

Translational regulation of ferritin. The mRNA contains an fe response chemical element (IRE) near its 5´ cap. In the presence of adequate supplies of iron, translation of the mRNA proceeds normally. If fe is scarce, however, a protein (called the (more than...)

It is interesting to note that the regulation of translation of ferritin mRNA by iron is like to the regulation of transferrin receptor mRNA stability, which was discussed in the previous chapter (run into Figure 6.48). Namely, the stability of transferrin receptor mRNA is regulated past poly peptide binding to an IRE in its 3´ untranslated region. The same protein binds to the IREs of both ferritin and transferrin receptor mRNAs. However, the consequences of protein binding to the 2 IREs are quite dissimilar. Poly peptide spring to the transferrin receptor IRE protects the mRNA from deposition rather than inhibiting its translation. These distinct effects presumably result from the unlike locations of the IRE in the two mRNAs. To part as a repressor-bounden site, the IRE must exist located within 70 nucleotides of the 5´ cap of ferritin mRNA, suggesting that protein binding to the IRE blocks translation by interfering with cap recognition and binding of the 40S ribosomal subunit. Rather than inhibiting translation, poly peptide binding to the aforementioned sequence in the 3´ untranslated region of transferrin receptor mRNA protects the mRNA from nuclease degradation. Binding of the same regulatory protein to different sites on mRNA molecules can thus take distinct effects on gene expression, in one case inhibiting translation and in the other stabilizing the mRNA to increment protein synthesis.

Another mechanism of translational regulation in eukaryotic cells, resulting in global furnishings on overall translational action rather than on the translation of specific mRNAs, involves modulation of the activity of initiation factors, particularly eIF-2. Every bit already discussed, eIF-2 (complexed with GTP) binds to the initiator methionyl tRNA, bringing information technology to the ribosome. The subsequent release of eIF-ii is accompanied by GTP hydrolysis, leaving eIF-two as an inactive Gross domestic product complex. To participate in another wheel of initiation, the eIF-ii/GTP circuitous must be regenerated by the exchange of spring GDP for GTP. This exchange is mediated past some other factor, eIF-2B. The control of eIF-ii activity by GTP bounden and hydrolysis is thus similar to that of EF-Tu (come across Figure 7.12). Yet, the regulation of eIF-2 provides a critical control signal in a diversity of eukaryotic cells. In particular, eIF-2 can be phosphorylated by regulatory protein kinases. This phosphorylation blocks the exchange of spring Gdp for GTP, thereby inhibiting initiation of translation. One type of cell in which such phosphorylation occurs is the reticulocyte, which is devoted to the synthesis of hemoglobin (Figure 7.16). The translation of globin mRNA is controlled by the availability of heme: The mRNA is translated just if adequate heme is available to form functional hemoglobin molecules. In the absence of heme, a protein kinase that phosphorylates eIF-2 is activated, and further translation is inhibited. Similar mechanisms take been found to control poly peptide synthesis in other prison cell types, particularly virus-infected cells in which viral poly peptide synthesis is inhibited past interferon.

Effigy 7.16

Regulation of translation by phosphorylation of eIF-2. Translation in reticulocytes (which is devoted to synthesis of hemoglobin) is controlled by the supply of heme, which regulates the activity of eIF-two. The active form of eIF-2 (complexed with GTP) (more...)

Other studies have implicated eIF-4E, which binds to the 5´ cap of mRNAs, as a translational regulatory poly peptide. For example, the hormone insulin stimulates poly peptide synthesis in adipocytes and muscle cells. This effect of insulin is mediated, at least in function, by phosphorylation of proteins associated with eIF-4E, resulting in stimulation of eIF-4E activeness and increased rates of translational initiation.

Translational regulation is especially important during early evolution. As discussed in Chapter 6, a diverseness of mRNAs are stored in oocytes in an untranslated form; the translation of these stored mRNAs is activated at fertilization or later stages of development. Ane mechanism of such translational regulation is the controlled polyadenylation of oocyte mRNAs. Many untranslated mRNAs are stored in oocytes with brusk poly-A tails (approximately 20 nucleotides). These stored mRNAs are subsequently recruited for translation at the appropriate stage of development by the lengthening of their poly-A tails to several hundred nucleotides. In addition, the translation of some mRNAs during development appears to exist regulated by repressor proteins that bind to specific sequences in their iii´ untranslated regions. These regulatory proteins may as well directly mRNAs to specific regions of eggs or embryos, allowing localized synthesis of the encoded proteins during embryonic development.

Box

Primal Experiment: Catalytic Role of Ribosomal RNA.

Box

Molecular Medicine: Antibiotics and Poly peptide Synthesis.

muellerwessin.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9849/